I have finally moved my blog to www.noisythink.com
All my new posts are there now.
Thanks.
- Jason
Wednesday, October 01, 2008
Friday, September 12, 2008
Sarah Palin supports Pro-choice candidate
Thursday, September 11, 2008
Both McCains commited to abortion
McCain, Bush and Keyes talk abortion issues. McCain rebukes Bush for not allowing abortion in certain cases.
Cindy McCain didn't get the memo that her husband is now pro-life.
Cindy McCain didn't get the memo that her husband is now pro-life.
Wednesday, September 10, 2008
Terror in the Womb: The Forgotten Victims of 911
(reprinted from Mark Harrington's CBR Midwest newsletter)
On Thursday, September 11, our nation remembers the victims of the terror attacks of seven years ago in New York City, Pennsylvania, and Washington D.C. Every American remembers where they were when we were attacked, just as we remember where we were when President Ronald Reagan was shot, or when the Challenger space shuttle blew up on take off, and for those of us old enough when JFK was assassinated. On September 11, 2001, I was in Miami, FL driving one of the Center For Bio-Ethical Reform’s (CBR) Reproductive “Choice” Trucks. Just as I was on the phone with local reporte! rs attempting to secure some media coverage of our pro-life billboard truck project, the tragic news came over the radio. I will never forget that day.
I will never forget that fateful day not only because of the devastation it brought to New York and our nation’s capital but because it crystallized in my mind forever the battle to which I have been called. That call is to defend the forgotten victims of terror – America’s unborn children.
Interestingly, more Americans were killed by abortionists on September 11 (about 3,200) than were killed by Islamic terrorists (about 3,000). Assuming 3,000 deaths among the 50,000 people who worked at the World Trade Center, about one in seventeen was killed. One in three unborn babies is killed by abortion every day. On September 11, it would have been six times safer to be a worker in the Twin Towers than it was to be a baby in her mother’s womb.
Why do Americans support the “War on Terror,” but ignore the plight of the unborn?
Why did Americans write big checks to the Red Cross and the United Way, but ignore pro-life organizations which are struggling to raise funds?
Could it be because the press made the victims of September 11 so painfully real? After all, we were shown pictures of the World Trade Center tragedy on television night after night for weeks and months. Grieving relatives were interviewed. Their backgrounds were profiled. The press also made real the horror of the victim’s deaths. The sight of airliners crashing into skyscrapers tortured us. We were sickened by pictures of people jumping from the upper floors. We gasped as the buildings collapsed into rubble. The images were published and broadcast until they became unbearable. Thus was forged a national consensus that, somehow, each of us must fight terrorism, personally, regardless of the cost.
Sadly, no such consensus exists concerning abortion -- even in the church.
The victims of abortion are anonymous. The horror of abortion is invisible. Of course American’s aren’t haunted by abortion. How could they be?
The good news for the forgotten unborn victims of terror is that CBR and others who use the photographic evidence of abortion intend to change all that. Many pro lifers hope to do for the public’s perception of abortion what the media has done for people’s understanding of Muslim terrorism. Abortion pictures have been banned from television, newspapers and magazines but we have airplane photos, truck photos and hand-held signs and we are using them to make abortion as unavoidable as the press made the terror of 9/11.
We continue our Genocide Awareness Project on college campuses, our work with crisis pregnancy centers, our video production endeavors, and Reproductive “Choice” Campaign (RCC).
Kristin Doss, 20, who is pro-life and once briefly considered an abortion, was shocked by the images.
"They think making it graphic is going to change people's minds when, in actuality, it's just making people mad," she said. "If I was thinking about an abortion, it would make me think twice, but it would also make me angry because it is a person's right and doing that is forcing something on someone."
People get angry when pro-lifers show the truth about abortion because they don't want to be bothered. The pro-life movement is losing this struggle precisely because enough people aren’t bothered by abortion. Unlike 9/11, abortion has not exacted enough of an emotional toll on American society. The culture is in massive denial about what abortion is and does.
Also unlike the terror of 9/11, pro-lifers do not have a willing media to help forge a consensus on the terror of abortion. Americans are not angered at the news media for showing the pictures of 9/11 because Americans are not complicit in the deaths of those who perished in the Twin Towers or Pentagon. However, many Americans ARE angered by our images of aborted babies because at least 40 million parents have participated in the killing of an unborn baby. The news media, entertainment media, education establishment, clergy, etc. have suppressed the truth about abortion. Therefore, we must bypass these gatekeepers and take our message directly to our target audience. This is the lesson of historical social reform.
Social reformers have always had to force-feed facts into the heads of people who resist evidence of their own complicity in injustice. The Reproductive “Choice” Campaign and other similar efforts by pro lifers across America will continue to disturb the nation until the stress becomes unendurable. Sooner or later Americans will be forced to come to grips with the victims of abortion.
3000 Americans died on September 11, 2001 by the hands of foreign terrorists to which our nation rightly mourns. Unfortunately, few Americans realize that on the very next day (and everyday since) September 12, 2001 another four thousand Americans died at the hands of domestic terrorists (abortionists) and few if any noticed. Sadly, for these victims of terror there is no day of remembrance.
Mark Harrington is the Executive Director of CBR Midwest, and hosts Activist Radio.
On Thursday, September 11, our nation remembers the victims of the terror attacks of seven years ago in New York City, Pennsylvania, and Washington D.C. Every American remembers where they were when we were attacked, just as we remember where we were when President Ronald Reagan was shot, or when the Challenger space shuttle blew up on take off, and for those of us old enough when JFK was assassinated. On September 11, 2001, I was in Miami, FL driving one of the Center For Bio-Ethical Reform’s (CBR) Reproductive “Choice” Trucks. Just as I was on the phone with local reporte! rs attempting to secure some media coverage of our pro-life billboard truck project, the tragic news came over the radio. I will never forget that day.
I will never forget that fateful day not only because of the devastation it brought to New York and our nation’s capital but because it crystallized in my mind forever the battle to which I have been called. That call is to defend the forgotten victims of terror – America’s unborn children.
Interestingly, more Americans were killed by abortionists on September 11 (about 3,200) than were killed by Islamic terrorists (about 3,000). Assuming 3,000 deaths among the 50,000 people who worked at the World Trade Center, about one in seventeen was killed. One in three unborn babies is killed by abortion every day. On September 11, it would have been six times safer to be a worker in the Twin Towers than it was to be a baby in her mother’s womb.
On September 11, it would have been six times safer to be a worker in the Twin Towers than it was to be a baby in her mother’s womb.
Why do Americans support the “War on Terror,” but ignore the plight of the unborn?
Why did Americans write big checks to the Red Cross and the United Way, but ignore pro-life organizations which are struggling to raise funds?
Could it be because the press made the victims of September 11 so painfully real? After all, we were shown pictures of the World Trade Center tragedy on television night after night for weeks and months. Grieving relatives were interviewed. Their backgrounds were profiled. The press also made real the horror of the victim’s deaths. The sight of airliners crashing into skyscrapers tortured us. We were sickened by pictures of people jumping from the upper floors. We gasped as the buildings collapsed into rubble. The images were published and broadcast until they became unbearable. Thus was forged a national consensus that, somehow, each of us must fight terrorism, personally, regardless of the cost.
Sadly, no such consensus exists concerning abortion -- even in the church.
The victims of abortion are anonymous. The horror of abortion is invisible. Of course American’s aren’t haunted by abortion. How could they be?
The good news for the forgotten unborn victims of terror is that CBR and others who use the photographic evidence of abortion intend to change all that. Many pro lifers hope to do for the public’s perception of abortion what the media has done for people’s understanding of Muslim terrorism. Abortion pictures have been banned from television, newspapers and magazines but we have airplane photos, truck photos and hand-held signs and we are using them to make abortion as unavoidable as the press made the terror of 9/11.
We continue our Genocide Awareness Project on college campuses, our work with crisis pregnancy centers, our video production endeavors, and Reproductive “Choice” Campaign (RCC).
Kristin Doss, 20, who is pro-life and once briefly considered an abortion, was shocked by the images.
"They think making it graphic is going to change people's minds when, in actuality, it's just making people mad," she said. "If I was thinking about an abortion, it would make me think twice, but it would also make me angry because it is a person's right and doing that is forcing something on someone."
People get angry when pro-lifers show the truth about abortion because they don't want to be bothered. The pro-life movement is losing this struggle precisely because enough people aren’t bothered by abortion. Unlike 9/11, abortion has not exacted enough of an emotional toll on American society. The culture is in massive denial about what abortion is and does.
Also unlike the terror of 9/11, pro-lifers do not have a willing media to help forge a consensus on the terror of abortion. Americans are not angered at the news media for showing the pictures of 9/11 because Americans are not complicit in the deaths of those who perished in the Twin Towers or Pentagon. However, many Americans ARE angered by our images of aborted babies because at least 40 million parents have participated in the killing of an unborn baby. The news media, entertainment media, education establishment, clergy, etc. have suppressed the truth about abortion. Therefore, we must bypass these gatekeepers and take our message directly to our target audience. This is the lesson of historical social reform.
Social reformers have always had to force-feed facts into the heads of people who resist evidence of their own complicity in injustice. The Reproductive “Choice” Campaign and other similar efforts by pro lifers across America will continue to disturb the nation until the stress becomes unendurable. Sooner or later Americans will be forced to come to grips with the victims of abortion.
3000 Americans died on September 11, 2001 by the hands of foreign terrorists to which our nation rightly mourns. Unfortunately, few Americans realize that on the very next day (and everyday since) September 12, 2001 another four thousand Americans died at the hands of domestic terrorists (abortionists) and few if any noticed. Sadly, for these victims of terror there is no day of remembrance.
Mark Harrington is the Executive Director of CBR Midwest, and hosts Activist Radio.
Wednesday, July 09, 2008
Global Warming causes ice to grow???
Global warming causing California glacier to grow, scientists say
Didn't all of this madness start when Al Gore showed pictures of glaciers SHRINKING!
Touch blue make it true!
No Eraseys. (Dumb & Dumber)
Friday, July 04, 2008
Obama plan would expand faith based welfare
Obama plan would expand faith-based program
President Bush seduced American Christians into socialism and now that the barrier has been broken, Obama is carrying the torch.
Wednesday, July 02, 2008
Are Rich Christians evil?
I keep hearing about this Shane Claiborne on these Emergent websites. I went to his web page and found he likes a book called "Rich Christians in an Age of Hunger".
The title explains the premise of he book.
Bad Christians who make a comfortable living should feel guilty for more than just surviving.
It is like when your parents told you to finish your dinner because there are starving people in China. Well the people in China are not starving because you didn't finish your peas. And you know what? If you took your peas and through them out every day for 20 years - God wouldn't care! (Your parents might).
Having wealth is not evil. If you buy a new pair of shoes every month it is not going to take away some African kids lunch because of it.
Monday, June 30, 2008
Designer Baby
A British woman has made history by conceiving the country's first "designer baby" guaranteed to be free from hereditary breast cancer.
Designer baby? What they really mean is that she conceived 11 children killed 6 defective children, stored 3 for later tried to carry the last two.
Is that like designing the Fatherland?
How about designing the Master Race?
Has a much more appealing ring to it than "genocide". Shoot, back in the day they even had some softer terminology. "Cleansing the Fatherland." Almost sound hygienic.
Monday, May 05, 2008
Has Child Protective Services called Bill Ray Cyrus yet? Probably not.
What would happen to a man that was caught taking photographs of his 15 year old daughter in various stages of undress in sexually suggestive and sultry poses and then posted those pictures on the internet.
Even in our broken system I believe the majority would consider this a crime and rightfully so. An investigation would take place. A trial would occur and this man would be convicted as a child predator. He would then be separated from his children and then be registered as a sex offender.
How come Hollywood has different rules by which the justice system meets justice?
How come if instead of taking the pictures himself - a world class photographer takes them?
How come if instead of posting them on the internet himself a magazine company publishes them online and in print?
How come Billy Ray Cyrus can take his daughter (Hannah Montana) to Vanity Fair to have this done in front of a dozen witnesses and a hundred social workers around the country will read about it and not bat an eye?
They don't care. They don't care because they have been trained by a depraved system that doesn't know right from wrong. And it is spilling over into everything so that most people, even Christians, will not recognize this as the crime that it is.
Saturday, April 19, 2008
Nazi progress: Outlawing public executions
About a year ago I wrote about the Gonzales v. Carhart decision the US Supreme Court delivered.
It was praised by conservative Christian leaders everywhere as a victory.
This month is the anniversary of that dreadful decision. Sadly, even though there was a big effort to educate Christians on the mass spread of mis-information, most Christians still don't understand what the decision was all about.
The abortion holocaust relates so closely to the Nazi holocaust, and it makes a good backdrop for comparing the two. What if there was a similar ruling that was announced by the Nazi high court.
This may have been what it would have been like.
http://noisythink.com/files/Carhart.mp3
It was praised by conservative Christian leaders everywhere as a victory.
This month is the anniversary of that dreadful decision. Sadly, even though there was a big effort to educate Christians on the mass spread of mis-information, most Christians still don't understand what the decision was all about.
The abortion holocaust relates so closely to the Nazi holocaust, and it makes a good backdrop for comparing the two. What if there was a similar ruling that was announced by the Nazi high court.
This may have been what it would have been like.
http://noisythink.com/files/Carhart.mp3
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)