Nazi progress: Outlawing public executions

About a year ago I wrote about the Gonzales v. Carhart decision the US Supreme Court delivered.
It was praised by conservative Christian leaders everywhere as a victory.

This month is the anniversary of that dreadful decision. Sadly, even though there was a big effort to educate Christians on the mass spread of mis-information, most Christians still don't understand what the decision was all about.

The abortion holocaust relates so closely to the Nazi holocaust, and it makes a good backdrop for comparing the two. What if there was a similar ruling that was announced by the Nazi high court.

This may have been what it would have been like.
http://noisythink.com/files/Carhart.mp3

Scalia: we should vote on murder

Antonin Scalia, the Supreme Court Justice, is promoted by Christian leaders to be a hero.

Dr. James Dobson wanted judges appointed by President Bush to be "in the mold of a Scalia or Thomas".

In March Scalia spoke at a University of Central Missouri and made the following comments (pulled from the Columbia Tribune).
http://www.columbiatribune.com/2008/Mar/20080305News002.asp

"The reality is the Constitution doesn't address the subject at all," Scalia said of abortion. "It is one of the many subjects not in the Constitution which is therefore left to democracy.

"If you want the right to an abortion, persuade your fellow citizens it's a good idea and pass a law. If you feel the other way, repeal the law."

Of torture, Scalia said: "It's a bad thing to do. But not everything that is bad is unconstitutional."

He suggested that every federal judge "be issued a stamp pad … and a stamp, and you would whack it on the pad and stomp it on the paper, and it says, 'Stupid but Constitutional.' "

Lets go back in time 55 years ago and listen to what might have taken place with this same kind of thinking.
http://noisythink.com/files/Scalia.mp3


Spoof courtesy of Antonin Scalia.

Remember: Ideas have consequences. Handle them with care.

The Horror: Gonzales v. Carhart

Hell and all it's Angels could not have written a more horror filled decision than the U.S. Supreme Court wrote on April 18, 2007. These five men -- these empty robes, wrote with a cold heart and a depraved and reprobate mind.

See theses horrific excerpts from Gonzales v. Carhart --

Ripping arms and legs off are less shocking

"The medical profession, furthermore, may find different and less shocking methods to abort the fetus in the second trimester, thereby accommodating legislative demand."

"The Act prohibits intact D&E; and, notwithstanding respondents’ arguments, it does not prohibit the D&E procedure which the fetus is removed in parts."

"The Court in Stenberg interpreted “‘substantial portion’” of the fetus to include an arm or a leg. 530 U. S., at 939. The Act’s anatomical landmarks, by contrast, clarify that the removal of a small portion of the fetus is not prohibited."

"Respondents have not shown that requiring doctors to intend dismemberment before delivery to an anatomical landmark will prohibit the vast majority of D&E abortions. The Act, then, cannot be held invalid on its face on these grounds."

Decision will not stop one late-term abortion

"The question is whether the Act, measured by its text in this facial attack, imposes a substantial obstacle to late-term, but previability, abortions. The Act does not on its face impose a substantial obstacle, and we reject this further facial challenge to its validity."

Court suggests other method for killing child

"If the intact D&E procedure is truly necessary in some circumstances, it appears likely an injection that kills the fetus is an alternative under the Act that allows the doctor to perform the procedure."

It was a win for pro-life ministries that supported it but a failure for the pre-born, common decency or moral truth.

I wept in anguish over the celebration of this decision by Christians everywhere.

I beg those who support life to read for your self.

http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/06pdf/05-380.pdf
http://www.kgov.com/bel_56kbps/20070427
http://www.kgov.com/files/docs/CRTL-PBA-Ruling-Analysis.pdf